Skip to main content

Joint Petition for Modification: A Proposal for an Expanded & Simplified Procedure

UPDATE:  The changes proposed in this post were adopted on June 25, 2013 and became effective August 1, 2013.

Massachusetts Supplemental Probate and Family Court Rule 412 currently allows for the filing of a Joint Petition for Modification of Child Support when two parents agree that the child support figure should be amended.  Often when there has been a material change in circumstances, two parents can agree that the child support should change to reflect the new circumstances.  If the new agreement can be reduced to a writing, then it can be submitted to the court with a Joint Petition under Rule 412, and the court may approve it without requiring a hearing (although the court may schedule a hearing if they have questions about the agreement).

The obvious benefit to this joint petition process is avoiding the cost and stress of unnecessary trips to court when an agreement is reached between the parties.  When parties can't agree on whether child support should change or not, then a Complaint for Modification may still be necessary.  However with more and more parties trying to save money and stress by turning to mediation and collaborative law, even post-judgment disagreements are often resolved outside of court.

The problem with Rule 412 is that it is limited to child support changes.  If parties agree to changes which involve custody, alimony or other modifiable issues, the court doesn't currently allow a Joint Petition to be filed.  This means that even in cases with a full Agreement for Modification, a Complaint still needs to be filed, served and then presented at a hearing.  This results in unnecessary cost and stress and discourages parties from reaching agreements, which is why the court is considering making changes:

Proposed Amendments to Rule 412 of the Supplemental Rules of the Probate and Family Court


The proposed amendments expand the Joint Petition option to cover any judgment or order in the family court.  This would allow for the same stream-lined process if a couple agrees to modify alimony, medical insurance, parenting plans, or any other such order or judgment.  The court still reserves the right to require a hearing, and in many cases this may be necessary to clarify for Judges why the changes are being made, especially in cases where agreements may be unclear.

However, with well written agreements, this new process will open up many cases to be handled without a court appearance, and encourage parties to use mediation and collaborative law options more often for post-judgment negotiations.  Overall, this could mean a reduction in the number of court cases and reduced stress and cost for many families.

The new provisions would still exclude 209A restraining order cases from the Joint Modification provisions.  This means that a hearing would still be required for changes to orders or judgments in restraining order cases, even under the new Rule.

According to the Press Release: comments on the proposed amendments should be directed to the Probate and Family Court Bench/Bar Committee on Rules, c/o Evelyn Patsos, Esq., and sent via facsimile to (617) 788-6605 or by email to evelyn.patsos@jud.state.ma.us on or before Friday, February 15, 2013.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the purpose of the Divorce Nisi waiting period?

In Massachusetts the statutory waiting period after a Judgment of Divorce and before the divorce becomes final (or absolute) is called the Nisi period. After a divorce case settles or goes to trial, a Judgment of Divorce Nisi will issue and it will become Absolute after a further ninety (90) days.

This waiting period serves the purpose of allowing parties to change their mind before the divorce becomes final. If the Judgment of Divorce Nisi has issued but not become final yet, and you and your spouse decide you don't want to get divorced, then you can file a Motion to Dismiss and the Judgment will be undone. Although many of my clients who are getting divorced think the idea of getting back together with their ex sounds crazy, I have had cases where this happened.

In addition to offering a grace period to change your mind, the Nisi period has three other legal effects:

1. The most obvious effect of the waiting period is that you cannot remarry during the Nisi period, because…

Does a Criminal Record affect Child Custody?

If one of the parents in a custody case has a criminal record, the types of crimes on their record could have an effect on their chances of obtaining custody. In custody cases the issue is always going to come down to whether or not the best interests of the child might be affected.

In the most extreme case, in which one parent has been convicted of first degree murder of the other parent, the law specifically prohibits visitation with the children until they are of a suitable age to assent.

Similarly, but to a less serious degree, in making custody and visitation determinations the court will consider crimes that would cause one to question the fitness of a parent. These types of crimes would obviously include any violent crime convictions which could call into question whether the children would be in danger around a parent who has shown themselves to resort to violence when faced with conflict. In addition, drug and alcohol abuse offenses would call into question a parent'…

The Questions that Lawyers and Mediators aren't asking but should: Let's talk about Pronouns

I recently had the opportunity to train with two of the most prominent mediators in Massachusetts: John Fiske and Diane Neumann. Each time they run a training, John and Diane share what they think is the most important question for a client to answer to have an effective mediation. John says that he thought the most important question is "What do I want?" But then he will tell you, with a knowing smile, that Diane disagreed with him and she would say that the most important question for a client to answer is "Who am I?"

I agree with Diane. The best lawyers and mediators ask their clients not just about what they want, but also deep questions about the clients' identity, goals, and values in order to help the clients resolve conflict in the most effective way possible. Despite knowing this, we often fail to ask clients the simplest questions when we first meet them or have them fill out an intake. We fail to give them an opportunity to answer the question “Who …