Skip to main content

5 Things you Should Include in a Divorce Agreement when Dividing Retirement Accounts

In a divorce, the court has the ability to order the division of retirement accounts, as a one-time non-taxable event, transferring a portion of the account from one spouse to the other. Whether or not all or part of a retirement account is divided depends on the rules of that jurisdiction and the facts of each case.  In this article we're not dealing with that determination but assuming there has been an agreement or order to divide an account.  Now what?

How the account is divided, and whether a QDRO or some other specialized order is required, depends on the type of account.  Regardless of the type of account, however, there are five basic pieces of information that a Plan Administrator or QDRO drafter will need in order to properly divide the account.  When drafting a Divorce Agreement or proposed Judgment it is best practice to include these five elements:

  1. Identify the Plan Information Clearly - It may seem obvious, but the Agreement or Judgment must sufficiently identify the retirement account so it is clear what account or accounts are being divided.  Specific account numbers and additional identifying information should be included in the financial statement rather than the Agreement itself.  That way the personal financial information remains out of the public file, but is available if necessary to clarify which account or accounts are being divided.
  2. Identify the Amount or Percentage to be Divided (but not both) - The division must be expressed as a percentage of the account or an exact dollar figure to be divided.  If a percentage and a figure are included in an Agreement then it can be ambiguous if the calculations don't match.  Also, in most cases the plan will not allow for a mix of percentages and amounts (e.g. 50% of the plan minus $10,000), so avoid any mixing and complete any necessary calculations prior to finalizing the agreement.   
  3. Identify the Division Date & Coveture Period - Accounts change in value due to market fluctuations (dealt with below), but also due to withdrawals, loans, and ongoing contributions.  All of these changes can create havoc with a division if a clear date of division is not identified.  If only a date of division is identified, then it's implied that the division includes all of the retirement account from the beginning of time until the date of division.  If the parties or the court intend to exclude premarital funds (or some other agreed upon exclusion period), then that information needs to be included in the order as well.  The period of the account that would be divided is generally referred to as the coveture period.  Simply stating that the parties divide the "marital coveture" period is not sufficient because this doesn't clarify whether the end date of that period should be the agreement date, the Judgment of Divorce Nisi date, or the Judgment of Divorce absolute date.  The agreement or order should define the "marital coveture" period if that term is used.
  4. Identify whether Market Gains & Losses are to be included in the Division - Divisions are not immediate.  Even in the simplest of cases the paperwork takes time to be completed, submitted and reviewed.  During that time, fluctuations in the investments for retirement accounts can be significant.  It is typical to include these fluctuations so that, as much as reasonably possible, the division approximates how each portion would have performed separately if they were divided as of the agreed upon date of division.  However, if this is not specified then it may not be clear whether gains & losses should be included.
  5. Identify whether Loans are Included - If a loan has been taken out against a retirement account then that will be reflected in the value.  If the division is a percentage than the Agreement or Order needs to specify whether the percentage is to be taken from the total account value (including the loan amount) or the net value (not including the loan amount).
These five requirements apply in almost every situation, but this is not an exhaustive list and there may be additional considerations depending on the circumstances of each case.  For example, if you intend to use a marital coveture period in a long-term marriage, you may want to check to see if the plan has records that date back to the date of marriage.  Records are not always available if the marriage date is far enough in the past.

Also, some plans may require addressing specific additional information, and in every case you and your lawyer should review the Summary Plan for the account to ensure that there aren't any unusual requirements.  For example, U.S. Military Thrift Savings Plans have special rules and don't follow QDROs, but similar orders can be created that have the same effect.  A plan that is more typical than a military pension is a private pension plan with survivor benefits.  These types of plans require the following additional information to be specified in the agreement or order:

Additional Information for Pensions with Survivor Benefits:

  1. Identify the Survivor Beneficiary - In a pension plan that includes survivor benefit options, those options are like an additional asset that needs to be addressed.  If the parties agree or the court decides that it is a marital asset, then that portion of the pension may need to be assigned as well.  If the ex-spouse is not designated as the survivor beneficiary then the plan owner will be able to change it to someone else, or if they remarry, the new spouse may automatically be their survivor beneficiary.
  2. Identify the Plan Option - In a pension plan that includes survivor benefit options, there are often multiple options that the plan owner can choose from at the time of retirement.  Usually choosing to reserve a survivor benefit reduces the lifetime benefit.  A QDRO can require that a particular option be selected, and this should be decided at the time of drafting the Divorce Agreement.  In addition, if an option with a survivor benefit is chosen, the QDRO may need to specify how the reduced lifetime benefit is effected: i.e. is the reduction shared by the parties or does the reduction only come out of the ex-spouse's share of the lifetime benefit?
Since retirement accounts are often some of the largest assets in a divorce, these issues can be particularly valuable to clients and require care by practitioners when drafting Agreements or Proposed Judgments.  If you're not sure if an Agreement completely addresses all of the retirement account issues, consider hiring someone who prepares QDRO or Retirement Division documents prior to finalizing your Agreement and have them review your draft language.  

If you would like a copy of our Sample Language for division of retirement accounts, or if you need someone to review your draft language or prepare a QDRO, contact us here.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the purpose of the Divorce Nisi waiting period?

In Massachusetts the statutory waiting period after a Judgment of Divorce and before the divorce becomes final (or absolute) is called the Nisi period. After a divorce case settles or goes to trial, a Judgment of Divorce Nisi will issue and it will become Absolute after a further ninety (90) days. This waiting period serves the purpose of allowing parties to change their mind before the divorce becomes final. If the Judgment of Divorce Nisi has issued but not become final yet, and you and your spouse decide you don't want to get divorced, then you can file a Motion to Dismiss and the Judgment will be undone. Although many of my clients who are getting divorced think the idea of getting back together with their ex sounds crazy, I have had cases where this happened. In addition to offering a grace period to change your mind, the Nisi period has three other legal effects: 1. The most obvious effect of the waiting period is that you cannot remarry during the Nisi period, be

Does a Criminal Record affect Child Custody?

If one of the parents in a custody case has a criminal record, the types of crimes on their record could have an effect on their chances of obtaining custody. In custody cases the issue is always going to come down to whether or not the best interests of the child might be affected. In the most extreme case, in which one parent has been convicted of first degree murder of the other parent, the law specifically prohibits visitation with the children until they are of a suitable age to assent. Similarly, but to a less serious degree, in making custody and visitation determinations the court will consider crimes that would cause one to question the fitness of a parent. These types of crimes would obviously include any violent crime convictions which could call into question whether the children would be in danger around a parent who has shown themselves to resort to violence when faced with conflict. In addition, drug and alcohol abuse offenses would call into question a parent&#

The Questions that Lawyers and Mediators aren't asking but should: Let's talk about Pronouns

I recently had the opportunity to train with two of the most prominent mediators in Massachusetts: John Fiske and Diane Neumann . Each time they run a training, John and Diane share what they think is the most important question for a client to answer to have an effective mediation. John says that he thought the most important question is "What do I want?" But then he will tell you, with a knowing smile, that Diane disagreed with him and she would say that the most important question for a client to answer is "Who am I?" I agree with Diane. The best lawyers and mediators ask their clients not just about what they want, but also deep questions about the clients' identity, goals, and values in order to help the clients resolve conflict in the most effective way possible. Despite knowing this, we often fail to ask clients the simplest questions when we first meet them or have them fill out an intake. We fail to give them an opportunity to answer the question “W