Skip to main content

Is Fair a Dirty Word in Divorce?

I recently read a post entitled "Why 'Fair' is the F-Word in Divorce Negotiations" by Shawn Weber, which posits that fairness, as a subjective concept, bogs people down and can keep them from reaching agreements.  I agree with Mr. Weber that the focus of divorce negotiation should be "on making a decision that can end the conflict so that a person can move on, which in turn will bring peace."   However, I also believe that sometimes understanding the concept of "what is fair" to a person is integral to a couple finding peace.

Mr. Weber rightly points out that asking the question "what is fair" will often result in two answers that do not intersect.  Consider, for example, a hypothetical couple fighting over whether the children are ready to meet the mother's new boyfriend.  The mother may think it's unfair for her not to have the choice of when is the right time to make that introduction, and the father may think it's unfair if he doesn't have a say since they are his children too.  If we only ask "what is fair" this may seem like an intractable disagreement.


What happens, though, when we ask one simple follow up question, "why does that feel fair to you?" An open-ended "why" question gives people a chance to explain themselves and reveals a significant amount of information below the surface:


We want clients to be reasonable about the fact that a potential court outcome may not feel "fair" and therefore they may not have many options.  But if we throw out the concepts of "fair" and "unfair" altogether, then the benchmark for deciding resolution still has to come from somewhere.  If the only measuring stick for resolution is the law, then people are just substituting what lawyers and judges think is fair for their own judgment.

When people choose an out-of-court settlement option, like mediation or collaborative negotiation, one of the advantages is that they don't have to accept the limitations of the law.  For some that freedom is too broad, because it means they can't rely on the legal benchmark for what is a reasonable resolution.  But if we don't make "fair" a dirty word, and instead encourage people to explore why something feels fair to them, then they are more likely to find something else on the way to resolution: understanding.

Ultimately, I believe if we treat "fair" as a dirty word then we are limiting our clients to compromise rather than helping them reach agreements through understanding.  Even if the resolution is the same, approaching a solution from a point of understanding instead of compromise is the difference between a feeling of "gain" versus one of "loss."  In cases where the parties may have an ongoing relationship, such as co-parenting after divorce, this could be the difference between resolving conflict and postponing it.

Visit our website to learn more about conflict resolution options, and if you want to know more about The Power of Questions to elicit understanding check out this upcoming training from MCLC.

   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the purpose of the Divorce Nisi waiting period?

In Massachusetts the statutory waiting period after a Judgment of Divorce and before the divorce becomes final (or absolute) is called the Nisi period. After a divorce case settles or goes to trial, a Judgment of Divorce Nisi will issue and it will become Absolute after a further ninety (90) days.

This waiting period serves the purpose of allowing parties to change their mind before the divorce becomes final. If the Judgment of Divorce Nisi has issued but not become final yet, and you and your spouse decide you don't want to get divorced, then you can file a Motion to Dismiss and the Judgment will be undone. Although many of my clients who are getting divorced think the idea of getting back together with their ex sounds crazy, I have had cases where this happened.

In addition to offering a grace period to change your mind, the Nisi period has three other legal effects:

1. The most obvious effect of the waiting period is that you cannot remarry during the Nisi period, because…

Does a Criminal Record affect Child Custody?

If one of the parents in a custody case has a criminal record, the types of crimes on their record could have an effect on their chances of obtaining custody. In custody cases the issue is always going to come down to whether or not the best interests of the child might be affected.

In the most extreme case, in which one parent has been convicted of first degree murder of the other parent, the law specifically prohibits visitation with the children until they are of a suitable age to assent.

Similarly, but to a less serious degree, in making custody and visitation determinations the court will consider crimes that would cause one to question the fitness of a parent. These types of crimes would obviously include any violent crime convictions which could call into question whether the children would be in danger around a parent who has shown themselves to resort to violence when faced with conflict. In addition, drug and alcohol abuse offenses would call into question a parent'…

The Questions that Lawyers and Mediators aren't asking but should: Let's talk about Pronouns

I recently had the opportunity to train with two of the most prominent mediators in Massachusetts: John Fiske and Diane Neumann. Each time they run a training, John and Diane share what they think is the most important question for a client to answer to have an effective mediation. John says that he thought the most important question is "What do I want?" But then he will tell you, with a knowing smile, that Diane disagreed with him and she would say that the most important question for a client to answer is "Who am I?"

I agree with Diane. The best lawyers and mediators ask their clients not just about what they want, but also deep questions about the clients' identity, goals, and values in order to help the clients resolve conflict in the most effective way possible. Despite knowing this, we often fail to ask clients the simplest questions when we first meet them or have them fill out an intake. We fail to give them an opportunity to answer the question “Who …