Skip to main content

Married with Children - Who is a Legal Parent? Part 2

Post by Valerie Qian.  Valerie is an Associate at Skylark Law & Mediation, PC.  Valerie's practice includes family law & divorce representation, mediation, and collaborative divorce.

The Presumption of Legal Parentage to a child born of a Marriage

Is it presumed that a child who is born into a marriage is legally the child of the other spouse of the marriage?  The short answer is yes, regardless of whether the child is biologically related to the other spouse.

The statute governing this question in Massachusetts is Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 209C, Section 6.  Moreover, any child born as a result of artificial insemination with spousal consent is considered to be the legal child of the consenting spouse per G. L. c. 46, § 4B.

Chapter 209C, Section 6 states that a man is presumed to be the father of a child if he is married to the mother of a child at the time that a child is born. He is also presumed to be the father of a child if the child is born within 300 days after a marriage ends, whether it ends by divorce, annulment, or death.

A man may also be presumed to be the father of a child if he attempts – even if he ultimately fails – to solemnize a marriage in compliance with the laws of the Commonwealth – between himself and the mother of the child. If this attempted marriage takes place before the child is born, and the child is born during the attempted marriage or within 300 days after it ends, the man may be presumed to be the father of the child.

This means that even if a marriage is later declared invalid there may still be a presumption that the attempted husband is a father.  Chapter 209C, Section 6 outlines this presumption in more depth, but a presumption can also be overcome.  Chapter 209C requires the presumed father to be included in an action trying to establish a different father, except "a husband or former husband shall not be required to be joined as a party if non-paternity of the child has previously been adjudicated" in another proceeding.

This presumption, though written in the statute in traditional gender roles, has been extended to same sex marriages per Hunter v. Rose.

Previous Post: Who is a Legal Parent: Part 1

Next Post: UnMarried with Children - Who is a Legal Parent? Part 3

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the purpose of the Divorce Nisi waiting period?

In Massachusetts the statutory waiting period after a Judgment of Divorce and before the divorce becomes final (or absolute) is called the Nisi period. After a divorce case settles or goes to trial, a Judgment of Divorce Nisi will issue and it will become Absolute after a further ninety (90) days.

This waiting period serves the purpose of allowing parties to change their mind before the divorce becomes final. If the Judgment of Divorce Nisi has issued but not become final yet, and you and your spouse decide you don't want to get divorced, then you can file a Motion to Dismiss and the Judgment will be undone. Although many of my clients who are getting divorced think the idea of getting back together with their ex sounds crazy, I have had cases where this happened.

In addition to offering a grace period to change your mind, the Nisi period has three other legal effects:

1. The most obvious effect of the waiting period is that you cannot remarry during the Nisi period, because…

Does a Criminal Record affect Child Custody?

If one of the parents in a custody case has a criminal record, the types of crimes on their record could have an effect on their chances of obtaining custody. In custody cases the issue is always going to come down to whether or not the best interests of the child might be affected.

In the most extreme case, in which one parent has been convicted of first degree murder of the other parent, the law specifically prohibits visitation with the children until they are of a suitable age to assent.

Similarly, but to a less serious degree, in making custody and visitation determinations the court will consider crimes that would cause one to question the fitness of a parent. These types of crimes would obviously include any violent crime convictions which could call into question whether the children would be in danger around a parent who has shown themselves to resort to violence when faced with conflict. In addition, drug and alcohol abuse offenses would call into question a parent'…

The Questions that Lawyers and Mediators aren't asking but should: Let's talk about Pronouns

I recently had the opportunity to train with two of the most prominent mediators in Massachusetts: John Fiske and Diane Neumann. Each time they run a training, John and Diane share what they think is the most important question for a client to answer to have an effective mediation. John says that he thought the most important question is "What do I want?" But then he will tell you, with a knowing smile, that Diane disagreed with him and she would say that the most important question for a client to answer is "Who am I?"

I agree with Diane. The best lawyers and mediators ask their clients not just about what they want, but also deep questions about the clients' identity, goals, and values in order to help the clients resolve conflict in the most effective way possible. Despite knowing this, we often fail to ask clients the simplest questions when we first meet them or have them fill out an intake. We fail to give them an opportunity to answer the question “Who …