Skip to main content

Can I Get a Divorce or Annulment if my Spouse has an STD?

Image
By
In Massachusetts, the possible grounds for divorce are cruel and abusive treatment, utter desertion, adultery, intoxication, impotency, nonsupport, confinement to prison for 5 years or more, and irretrievable breakdown (i.e. the no-fault standard).

The possible grounds for annulment are incest, polygamy, being underage, being insane, failure to properly complete the marriage, impotence, fraud, misrepresentation of chastity, misrepresentation of disease, and duress.

If one party conceals that they have a sexually transmitted disease then that could be considered a fraud and sufficient to annul the marriage. If the parties lived together or consummated the marriage after this knowledge was learned that action would likely remove the misrepresentation as a basis for annulment.

If you are not able to obtain an annulment, you would still be able to obtain a divorce. It is possible you could argue for divorce based on impotence, which is strictly defined as an inability to have sexual intercourse. The existence of an STD could be argued as impotence although not technically making intercourse impossible. As with any fault argument, you would bear the burden of proving this fault as a prerequisite to obtaining the divorce, which is one of the reasons we often counsel clients not to file fault divorce cases (as discussed in this previous post: Is No-Fault Divorce a Good Thing? It may soon be the law in all 50 states.).

It would be easier, therefore, to simply apply for divorce based on the no-fault standard in which you could claim an irretrievable breakdown without having to prove the existence or impact of the STD.

For more information about Annulments read our previous post specifically on that subject: Can I obtain an Annulment?

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the purpose of the Divorce Nisi waiting period?

By
In Massachusetts the statutory waiting period after a Judgment of Divorce and before the divorce becomes final (or absolute) is called the Nisi period. After a divorce case settles or goes to trial, a Judgment of Divorce Nisi will issue and it will become Absolute after a further ninety (90) days. This waiting period serves the purpose of allowing parties to change their mind before the divorce becomes final. If the Judgment of Divorce Nisi has issued but not become final yet, and you and your spouse decide you don't want to get divorced, then you can file a Motion to Dismiss and the Judgment will be undone. Although many of my clients who are getting divorced think the idea of getting back together with their ex sounds crazy, I have had cases where this happened. In addition to offering a grace period to change your mind, the Nisi period has three other legal effects: 1. The most obvious effect of the waiting period is that you cannot remarry during the Nisi period, be
74 comments
Read more

Does a Criminal Record affect Child Custody?

By
If one of the parents in a custody case has a criminal record, the types of crimes on their record could have an effect on their chances of obtaining custody. In custody cases the issue is always going to come down to whether or not the best interests of the child might be affected. In the most extreme case, in which one parent has been convicted of first degree murder of the other parent, the law specifically prohibits visitation with the children until they are of a suitable age to assent. Similarly, but to a less serious degree, in making custody and visitation determinations the court will consider crimes that would cause one to question the fitness of a parent. These types of crimes would obviously include any violent crime convictions which could call into question whether the children would be in danger around a parent who has shown themselves to resort to violence when faced with conflict. In addition, drug and alcohol abuse offenses would call into question a parent&#
65 comments
Read more

The Questions that Lawyers and Mediators aren't asking but should: Let's talk about Pronouns

By
I recently had the opportunity to train with two of the most prominent mediators in Massachusetts: John Fiske and Diane Neumann . Each time they run a training, John and Diane share what they think is the most important question for a client to answer to have an effective mediation. John says that he thought the most important question is "What do I want?" But then he will tell you, with a knowing smile, that Diane disagreed with him and she would say that the most important question for a client to answer is "Who am I?" I agree with Diane. The best lawyers and mediators ask their clients not just about what they want, but also deep questions about the clients' identity, goals, and values in order to help the clients resolve conflict in the most effective way possible. Despite knowing this, we often fail to ask clients the simplest questions when we first meet them or have them fill out an intake. We fail to give them an opportunity to answer the question “W
2 comments
Read more