We recently posted a lengthy review of the the Massachusetts SJC decision in Cavanagh v. Cavanagh (2002)  and a similar overview of the subsequent SJC decision Openshaw v. Openshaw (2024) .  Both of these cases had significant rulings that should be reviewed in child support and alimony cases in Massachusetts.  Here, though, we want to focus on just one area these decisions have affected: how best to complete the court form Financial Statement in divorce cases. When completing the income section of the Financial Statement, people often struggle with how to deal with variable income and how to accurately address deductions from income.   The Financial Statement includes spaces for many times of income but it assumes the number is static.  For bonus, commissions, or second job income (which was an issue in Cavanagh), the income is often variable over time.  This is where we encourage our clients to use endnotes to explain any variability or expected chan...

April Showers Brought May Flowers: How the Openshaws Prepared for Rainy Days Ahead  by Nathaniel Butzke      Just in time for the rainy season, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court shed new light on what it means to "live" a certain lifestyle as a married couple and how those habits should be reflected in post-divorce alimony. The case, Openshaw v. Openshaw (2024) , revolved around a couple who, during their marriage, didn't just focus on living well but also on saving wisely. When their marriage came to an end, the question arose: should their habit of saving be considered part of their marital lifestyle for the purposes of determining the appropriate amount of alimony?      The court's answer was a resounding YES . In essence, the court argued that saving isn't just a financial strategy; it's a way of life. For the Openshaws, who enjoyed a generous annual income far exceeding their living expenses, setting money aside wasn't merely about preparin...